Yet again, in light of all the whining coming from the Demobrats over the just-passed federal tax cut: * unconstitutional spending causes deficits * unconstitutional spending causes deficits * unconstitutional spending causes deficits Did I happen to mention that unconstitutional spending causes deficits? Putting money back in to the pockets of those actually paying taxes, i.e., the top 50% of all those collecting a paycheck, does not constitute a deficit problem. Speaking of those actually paying taxes, yes, these tax cuts favor "the rich," if you consider a dual-income married couple with two kids bringing in around $125,00 a year "rich." Those are the people actually paying taxes; a single-income married couple with two kids bringing in only $18,000 a year is paying very little, if any, income tax. Stop your whining, your leftist sociocrats, and work toward cutting out those programs and departments that the federal government is unconstitutionally funding. And this goes for several members of the Republican party as well. Cut the pork, and the deficit will go down. Speaking of bringing down the deficit, riddle me this: what was the Clinton administration doing to lead the country to better fiscal management? Clinton supporters have long pointed to how, during the Clinton administration, our federal government ran a "surplus." Government should never have a surplus--it says either the government doesn't have its fiscal priorities in order, or the citizenry is over-taxed, or both. Why wasn't this surplus going toward paying down the national debt? That would have shown good financial sense.